Iranian Journal of Forest

Iranian Journal of Forest

Evaluation of the efficiency of supervised algorithms in preparing the ground cover map using Sentinel 2 images in the Zagros Forest Habitat

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Assistant Prof., Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction:The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of various algorithms in enhancing the accuracy of land cover maps using Sentinel images.
Material and Methods: The study area is a sheet (1:25000) encompassing an area of 15782.6 hectares. The land cover map was created using a range of algorithms - Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood, minimum distance, neural network, parallelepiped, support vector machine, spectral angle mapper, spectral information divergence, and binary encoding - applied to the optimal band composition derived from 12 bands (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8a, 11, 12, NDVI, SAVI). The training area was obtained from field information and satellite images. 70% of the samples were used for classification and 30% for evaluating the accuracy of the classified maps.
Findings:The results indicate that the support vector machine, neural network, and maximum likelihood classifications have the highest accuracy. The support vector machine classifier is slightly more accurate than the other two classifiers. To improve the classification, support vector machine kernels (linear, polynomial, radial basis function, and sigmoid), spectral angle mapper settings (6 modes), and parallelepiped (2 modes) were utilized. The results show that the support vector machine classifier, using the 6th degree polynomial function method, has the highest accuracy. Following this, the map was post-processed with the highest accuracy, resulting in an overall accuracy of 96.63 and a kappa coefficient of 0.9393.
Conclusion: An examination of 21 classification modes on Sentinel images in this study provides a comprehensive review of classification algorithms compared to previous studies.
Keywords

Forkuor, G., Dimobe, K., Serme, I., & Tondoh, J. (2018). Landsat-8 vs. Sentinel-2: examining the added value of sentinel-2's red-edge bands to land-use and land-cover mapping in Burkina Faso. GIS science and remote sensing, 55(3), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1370169
Ghayour, L., Neshat, A., Paryani, S., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chen, W., Al-Ansari, N., Geertsema, M., Pourmehdi Amiri, M., Gholamnia, M., & et al. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI Data for Land Cover/Use Classification Using a Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sensing, 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071349
Godarzi Mehr, S., Abbaspour, R.A., Ahadnezhad, V., & Khakbaz, B. (2012). Comparison Of Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, And Maximum Likelihood Methods for The Separation of Lithological Units. Iranian journal of geology, 6(22), 75-92. (In persian)
Guo, Y., De Jong, K., Liu, F., Wang, X., & Li, C. (2012). A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines on Land Cover Classification. In Z. Li, X. Li, Y. Liu & Z. Cai (Eds.), Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems (pp. 531-539). Berlin: Springer Press.
Halder, A., Ghosh, A., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Supervised and unsupervised landuse map generation from remotely sensed images using ant-based systems. Application of soft computing, 11, 5770–5781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.02.030
Hawryło, P., Bednarz, B., Wężyk, P., & Szostak, M. (2018). Estimating defoliation of Scots pine stands using machine learning methods and vegetation indices of Sentinel-2. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1417745
Jensen, J.R. (2015). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. USA, South Carolina: Pearson Publishing, 656p.
Khoshlahje, M., Ranjgar, B., Moghimi, A., Beheshtifar, S., Maghsodi, Y., & Mohamadzade, A. (2019). A review of the methods and models used in identifying land use changes based on remote sensing and GIS (with emphasis on studies conducted in Iran). Surveying science and technology, 9(2), 225-242. (In persian)
Maroufzade, E., & Attarod, P. (2021). Are variations of forest vegetation consistent with trends of meteorological parameters in the northern Zagros region of Iran?. Iranian Journal of Forest, 2(4), 449-466.  (In persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/ijf.2021.127780
Masek, J.G., Hayes, D.J., Joseph Hughes, M., Healey, S.P., & Turner, D.P. (2015). The role of remote sensing in process-scaling studies of managed forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 355, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.032
Mohamed Abdi, A. (2020). Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data. Giscience &Remote sensing, 57(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1650447
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support Vector Machines in Remote Sensing: A Review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66, 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
Mokhtari, M.H., & Najafi, A., (2015). Comparison of of support vector machine and neural network in classification methods in land uses information extraction through Landsat TM data. Water and soil Sciences, 19 (72), 35-45. (In persian).  https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jstnar.19.72.4
Phiri, D., Simwanda, M., Salekin, S., Nyirenda, V.R., Murayama, Y., & Ranagalage, M. (2020). Sentinel-2 Data for Land Cover/Use Mapping: A Review. Remote Sensing, 12(14), 2291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142291
Priyadarshini, K.N., Kuma, M., Rahaman, S.A., & NitheshNirmal, S. (2018).  A Comparative study of advanced land use/land cover classification algorithms using sentinel2 data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf