Comparison of structural complexity index (SCI) in the developmental stages of Hyrcanian mixed beech forests

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Prof., Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, I. R. Iran

10.22034/ijf.2022.327756.1845

Abstract

The structural complexity of forest stands is one of the most important characteristics of natural forests. Changes in the forest stand structure through the development of stands cause complexity in the stand structure. We conducted this research to quantitative analysis of structural complexity in the three stages of stand development in the Hyrcanian forests. Three one-hectare study areas were selected within developmental stages (Totally 12 hectares) and after forest inventory, the structure complexity index was calculated for each stage. We employed ten variables including stem per hectare, mean of diameter at breast height (DBH), coefficient of variation of DBH, diameter Gini coefficient, number of trees with a diameter larger than 100 cm at breast height, the ratio of the number of trees in different stories, the faction of canopy gaps, amount and volume of dead woods and tree size variation to calculate this index. The mean and median complexity index was 65.46 and 66.15. the highest value obtained in the terminal (transition) stage was equal to 84.17 and the lowest was 49.3 in the initial stage. The structure complexity significantly was higher in the terminal stage, meanwhile based on the Tukey test, the difference between the initial (58.85±3.33) and optimal stage (61.39±4.23) was not significant. Considering the role of diversity and complexity of forests structure on forest ecological functions like maintaining biological diversity, it is necessary to consider complexity in all interventions and forest tending operations. Also, we proposed the forest complexity enhancement besides maintaining biodiversity should consider as the most important goal of forest management plans.

Keywords

References

 
Amini, R., Rahmani, R., & Parhizkar, P. (2018). Comparison of developmental stages in Beech Hornbeam stands using non-spatial indices of stand structure. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 26(2),156-167 (In Persian).
Amanzadeh, B., Sagheb-Talebi, K., Foumani, B.S., Fadaie, F., Camarero, J.J., & Linares, J.C. (2013). Spatial distribution and volume of dead wood in unmanaged Caspian beech (Fagus orientalis) forests from northern Iran. Forests, 4(4),751-765.
Brang, P., Spathelf, P., Larsen, J.B., Bauhus, J., Boncčìna, A., Chauvin, C., Drössler, L., García-Güemes, C., Heiri, C., Kerr, G., & Lexer, M.J. (2014). Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry, An International Journal of Forest Research, 87(4), 492-503.
Dănescu, A., Albrecht, A.T., & Bauhus, J. (2016). Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany. Oecologia, 182(2), 319-333.
Ehbrecht, M., Schall, P., Ammer, C., & Seidel, D. (2017). Quantifying stand structural complexity and its relationship with forest management, tree species diversity and microclimate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 242, 1-9.
Ellison, A.M., Bank, M.S., Clinton, B.D., Colburn, E.A., Elliott, K., Ford, C.R., Foster, D.R., Kloeppel, B.D., Knoepp, J.D., Lovett, G.M., & Mohan, J. (2005). Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(9), 479-486.
Esmaeilpour, M., & Sefidi, K. )2020(. The Natural Reconstruction of Beech Stands Structure under the Traditional Management (Case Study: Eshkevarat, Roodsar). Iranian Journal of Forest, 12(3), 435-448 (In Persian).
Franklin, J.F. and Van Pelt, R. (2004). Spatial aspects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. Journal of Forestry, 102(3), 22-28.
Gadow, K.V., Zhang, C.Y., Wehenkel, C., Pommerening, A., Corral-Rivas, J., Korol, M., Myklush, S., Hui, G.Y., Kiviste, A., & Zhao, X.H. (2012). Forest structure and diversity. In Continuous cover forestry (pp. 29-83). Springer, Dordrecht.
Gough, C.M., Atkins, J.W., Fahey, R.T.,  & Hardiman, B.S.(2019). High rates of primary production in structurally complex forests. Ecology, 100(10),1-6. 10.1002/ecy.2864
Gustafsson, L., Baker, S.C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W.J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Lõhmus, A., Pastur, G.M., Messier, C. & Neyland, M. (2012). Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests, a world perspective. BioScience, 62(7), 633-645.
Javanmiri pour, M., Mohadjer, M.R.M., Etemad, V., & Jourgholami, M. (2019). Determining structural variation in a managed mixed stand in an old-growth forest, northern Iran. Journal of Forestry Research, 30(5), 1859-1871.
Juchheim, J., Ehbrecht, M., Schall, P., Ammer, C., & Seidel, D. (2020). Effect of tree species mixing on stand structural complexity. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 93(1), 75-83.
Kazempour Larsary, M. )2017(. Spatial patterns, competition and spatial association of trees from different development stages in mixed beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands. Forest and Wood Products, 70(2), 303-314 (In Persian).
Korpel, Š. (1995). Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten; Gustav Fischer Verlag: New York, NY, USA.
Korpel, S. (1982). Degree of equilibrium and dynamic change of the forest an  example of natural forest of Slovakia, Act Faculties Forestails, Zvolen,Cezchoslovakia, 24, 9-30.
Leibundgut, H. (1993). Europäische Urwälder: Wegweiser zur Naturnahen Waldwirtschaft; Verlag Paul Haupt: Bern und Stuttgart, Germany.
McElhinny, C., Gibbons, P., Brack, C., & Bauhus, J. (2005). Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1-3), 1-24.
Meyer, P. (1999). Determination of development phases and diversity of forest texture. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitun. (Germany), 170, 203–211.
Mohammadi, L., Mohadjer, M.R., Etemad, V., Sefidi, K., & Nasiri, N. (2020). Natural regeneration within natural and man-made canopy gaps in Caspian natural beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) Forest, Northern Iran. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 39(1), 61-75.
Moridi, M., Sefidi, K., & Etemad, V. (2015). Stand characteristics of mixed oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in the stem exclusion phase, northern Iran. European journal of forest research, 134(4), 693-703.
Moridi, M., Fallah, A., Pourmajidian, M.R., & Sefidi, K. (2021). Quantitative Analysis of Forest Structure at Growing Up Volume Stage in the Evaluation of Natural Beech Stands (Case Study: Kheyroud Forest). Iranian Journal of Forest, 13(2), 115-128 (In Persian).
Nobahar, S., Sefidi, K., & Sagheb, T.K. (2018). Quantifying the structure of beech stands at old growth phase (Case study: Asalem forests, northern Iran). Forest research and development, 13(2), 115-124.
Parhizkar, P., Sagheb-Talebi, Kh., Mattaji, A.,Namiranian, M., Hasani, M., & Mortazavi, M. (2011). Tree and regeneration conditions within development stages in Kelardasht beech forest (Case study: reserve area-Langa). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 19(1), 141-153 (In Persian).
Parobeková, Z., Pittner, J., Kucbel, S., Saniga, M., Filípek, M., Sedmáková, D. ., Vencurik, J. & Jaloviar, P. (2018). Structural diversity in a mixed spruce-fir-beech old-growth forest remnant of the Western Carpathians. Forests, 9(7), 379.
Pommerening, A. (2002). Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 75(3), 305-324.
Reiniger, H. (1992). Das Plenterprinzip und seine Anwendung im Altersklassenwald. Forst und Holz, 47(9), 235-237.
Sabatini, F. M., Burrascano, S., Lombardi, F., Chirici, G., & Blasi, C. (2015). An index of structural complexity for Apennine beech forests. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8(3), 314.
Sagheb-Talebi, Kh. (2013). Appropriate characteristics of beech stands for application of close to nature  silviculture (selection system). Annual Report of Research Project, Published by Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, 120p (In Persian).
Sagheb-Talebi, Kh., Parhizkar, P., Hassani, M., Amanzadeh, B., Hemmati, A., Khanjani-Shiraz, B., Amini, M., Mohammadnejad Kiasari, S., Mirkazemi, S.Z., Karimidoost, A., & Maghsoudlou, M.K., (2020). Preliminary results of survey on stand structure in permanent research plots of Hyrcanian intact beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 28(2), 163-179 (In Persian).
Seidel, D., Ehbrecht, M., Dorji, Y., Jambay, J., Ammer, C., & Annighöfer, P. (2019). Identifying architectural characteristics that determine tree structural complexity. Trees, 33(3), 911-919.
Sefidi, K., Mohadjer, M.M., Etemad, V., & Mosandl, R. (2014). Late successional stage dynamics in natural Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in northern Iran (case study: Gorazbon district of Kheiroud-Kenar experimental forest). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(2), 270-283 (In Persian).
Sefidi, K., Pourgoli, Z., Sagheb-Talebi, K., & Behjou, F.K. (2018). Stand characteristics of gap formation phase through the development of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in the Hyrcanian Forests, northern Iran. Austrian Journal of  Forest Science, 2, 137-158.
Sefidi, K., Etemad, V., & Sadeghi, S.M.M. (2020a). Diameter class distibution of trees in three developmental stage of oriental beech forests. Proceeding of National Confrence on Forest Management Prespectives, 2, 38-46  (In Persian).
Sefidi, K., Copenheaver, C. A., & Sadeghi, S. M. M. (2022b). Anthropogenic pressures decrease structural complexity in Caucasian forests of Iran. Écoscience, 29(3), 199-209.
Taleshi, H., Jalali, S.G., Alavi, J., Hosseini, S.M., & Naimi, B.  )2018(. Climate change impacts on the distribution of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipski) in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest, 10(2), 251-266. (In Persian).
Watt, A. S. (1947). Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of ecology, 35(1/2), 1-22.
Willim, K., Stiers, M., Annighöfer, P., Ehbrecht, M., Ammer, C., & Seidel, D. (2020). Spatial patterns of structural complexity in differently managed and unmanaged beech-dominated forests in Central Europe. Remote Sensing, 12(12), 1907.
Zenner, E.K., Sagheb-Talebi, Kh., Akhavan, R., & Peck, J.E. (2015). Integration of small-scale canopy dynamics smoothes live-tree structural complexity across development stages in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forests at the multigap scale. Forest Ecology and Management, 335, 26-36.
 
Iranian Journal of Forest
Volume 14, Issue 4
February 2023
Pages 389-405

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 February 2022
  • Revise Date: 25 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 14 March 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics