Iranian Journal of Forest

Iranian Journal of Forest

Determination of an Appropriate Plot Size for Assessing Structural Characteristics of Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. Stands on the Southern Slopes of the Alborz Mountains, Aminabad Reserve, Firuzkuh

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Associate Prof., Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Assistant Prof., Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
4 Prof., Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
5 Prof., Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
10.22034/ijf.2026.541341.2062
Abstract
Introduction: Diversity in species composition and tree distribution leads to highly complex characteristics in forest ecosystems, arising from interactions among smaller‐scale spatial structures. Forest stand structure encompasses three major aspects: spatial pattern diversity, species diversity, and tree size diversity. The present study aimed to determine the minimum plot size required to assess structural characteristics of Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. stands and to evaluate the structural diversity of these stands in the Aminabad forest reserve of Firuzkuh, located within the Irano–Turanian phytogeographical region.
Materials and Methods: Three 3-ha sample plots (three stations) were randomly chosen, each consisting of six nested square subplots with areas of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 ha. For all trees and shrubs within each subplot, species identity, spatial coordinates, height, and crown variables (maximum crown diameter and its perpendicular diameter) were measured. Tree spatial coordinates were recorded using a multi-frequency GPS. Stand structure was quantified using the uniform angle index, nearest-neighbor distance, mingling index, tree size differentiation, and size dominance indices. To determine the most appropriate plot size, species–area curves and statistical comparisons of variables across different plot sizes (analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis test) were applied.
Results: A total of 13 tree and shrub species were recorded in the study area. Analysis of species number variation with increasing plot size showed that species richness increased up to 1.5 ha, after which the curve reached a plateau and species number remained constant; however, with further increase to 3 ha, species richness increased again. The first increase represented the species within the target plant association, whereas the second increase resulted from inclusion of areas outside the association boundary. Mean crown diameter of Juniperus trees did not differ significantly among plot sizes. Mean tree height also showed no significant difference among plots ranging from 1 to 3 ha, although in the first station significant differences were observed compared with smaller plots. No significant differences were detected in shrub size attributes among different plot sizes; however, results indicated that plots smaller than 1 ha may not include a sufficient number of shrub individuals for reliable analysis. The uniform angle index indicated a random pattern tending toward clustered in the first and second stations and a random pattern in the third station, with no significant differences in spatial distribution patterns of trees and shrubs across plot sizes. In none of the stations; mingling, size diversity, or complex structural diversity indices showed no significant difference when plot size increased from 1 to 3 ha; however, significant differences were observed in smaller plots, particularly in the first and third stations.
Conclusion: Based on the results, a plot size of 1 ha was identified as appropriate for structural studies of Juniperus forests. In stands with higher density (e.g., the second stand), satisfactory results can also be obtained using 0.75-ha plots, whereas in lower-density stands (e.g., the first stand), plots of up to 1.5 ha may be required. To record tree and shrub species within a Juniperus association, an area of approximately 1.5 ha is necessary, while larger areas (up to 3 ha) are required to capture the complete tree and shrub flora of Juniperus habitats.
Keywords
Subjects

Aguirre, O., Hui, G., von Gadow, K., & Jiménez, J. (2003). An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables. Forest ecology and management183(1-3), 137-145.
Akhavan, R., Momeni-Moghaddam, T., Akbari-Nia, M., & Hosseini, S.M. (2017). Spatial patterns and intra-specific competition of Juniper tree in different life stages using O- ring statistic in Layen Forests, Iran. Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 70(1), 111–125
Akhavan, R., & Rostamikia, Y. (2020). Inter-specific competition of juniper trees in Kandiragh forest reserve using O-ring statistic and mark correlation function. Forest and Wood Products73(2), 189-200. doi: 10.22059/jfwp.2020.295907.1066
Akhavan, R., & Hassani, M. (2023). Quantifying the structure of pure beech forests using spatial structural indices (case study: Hyrcanian forests of Mazandaran province, Iran). Forest research and Development, 9(2), 221-235.
Aliahmad Korori, S., Khoushnevis, M., & Matinizadeh, M. (2011). Comprehensive studies of Juniper species in Iran. Publication of Pooneh, Forest & Ranges and Watershed Organization of Iran, Iran, 554p.
Allen, L.J., Lou, Y., & Nevai, A.L. (2009). Spatial patterns in a discrete-time SIS patch model. Journal of mathematical biology, 58, 339-375.
Askari, Y., Soltani, A., & Sohrabi, H. (2014). Evaluation of spatial distribution pattern of tree and shrub species in a central Zagros (Case study: Chahartagh forest reserve). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research,  22(2), 175-187.
Azizi, Z., Sadeghi, H., & Hajimirzaei, A. (2017). Determining the status of tree and shrub type in irano-torani region (Case Study: Beik Poolad Watershed). Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 8(1), 1-8.
Batubeh, P., Akhavan, R., Pourhashemi, M., & Kiadehleri, H. (2013). Determination of the minimum appropriate plot size for analyzing the spatial distribution pattern of Quercus brantii in less-disturbed stands of the Marivan forests using Ripley’s K function. Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 66(1), 27–38.
Gadow, K., Hui, G., Chen, B.W., & Albert, M. (2003). Beziehungen zwischen Winkelmaßund Baumabständen: Relationship between the Winkelmaßand Nearest Neighbor Distances. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt122(2), 127-137.
Graz, P.F. (2004). The behavior of the species mingling index Msp in relation to species dominance and dispersion. European Journal of Forest Research, 123(1), 87-92.
Hosseinzadeh, R., Soosani, J., & Naghavi, H. (2022). Investigation of competition and structural characteristics of Fagus orientalis, Carpinus betulus and Quercus castanaefulia in different stratums (Case Study: Asalem Forests). Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 35(2), 250-263.
Hossein Zadeh, R., Soosani, J., Naghavi, H., Nourizadeh, M., & Darabi, M. (2023). The Effect of inventory method, and the size and shape of plots on quantifying structure of Quercus brantii Lindl coppice forests. Forest and Wood Products75(4), 331-340.
Hubbell, S.P. (1979). Tree Dispersion, Abundance, and Diversity in a Tropical Dry Forest: That tropical trees are clumped, not spaced, alters conceptions of the organization and dynamics. Science, 203(4387), 1299-1309.
Korpel, S. (1982). Degree of equilibrium and dynamic change of the forest an example of natural forest of Slovakia, Act Faculties Forestails,Zvolen,Cezchoslovakia, 24, 9-30.
Mauro, F., Haxtema, Z., & Temesgen, H. (2017) Comparison of sampling methods for estimation of nearestneighbor index values. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47(6), 703-715.
Panahi, P., Sagheb Talebi, K., Ravanbakhsh, H., Moridi, M., Pourhashemi, M., Ajani, Y., Hasaninejad, M., & Fadaei Khojasteh, M. (2024). Structure analysis of juniper (Juniperus excelsa M.B.) stands in the Irano-Turanian vegetation zone (Case study: Parvar Protected Area, Semnan Province). Forest and Wood Products, 77(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfwp.2024.380163.1354. (In Persian)
Pastorella, F., & Paletto, A. (2013). Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests (Italy). Journal of Forest Science, 59(4), 159-168.
Guinochet, M. (1973). Phytosociologie. Masson, France.
Pommerening, A. (2002). Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry, 3, 305-324.
Pommerening, A., & Stoyan, D. (2006). Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research36(7), 1723-1739.
Pourhashemi, M., Mansouri, F., Parhizkar, P., Panahi, P., & Hassani, M. (2014). Spatial pattern of sprout-clumps of Brant`s oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) in utilized forest stands of Marivan. Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 27(4), PP 534-543.
Ravanbakhsh, H., Marvi Mohajer, M.M., Zahedi, A.G., & Shirvani, A. (2010). Forest typology in relation with altitude gradient on southern slopes of central Alborz Mountains (Latian Dam Watershed).  Journal of Forest and Wood Products63(1), 9-22
Ravanbakhsh, H., HamzeH, Ee.B., Etemad, V., Marvie-Mohadjer, M.R., & Assadi, M. (2016). Phytosociology of Juniperus excelsa Beib. Forests in Alborz mountain range in the north of Iran. Plant Biosystems – An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 150(5), 987-1000.
Ravanbakhsh, H., Mohajer, M.M., & Etemad, V. (2010). Natural regeneration of woody species in woodlands of southern slopes of Elborz mountains (case study: Latian watershed). Iranian Journal of Forest, 2(2), 113-125
Ravanbakhsh, H., & Moshki, A. (2016). The influence of environmental variables on distribution patterns of Irano-Turanian forests in Alborz Mountains, Iran. Journal of Mountain Science13, 1375-1386.
Ravanbakhsh, H., Pourhashemi, M., Hamzeh`ee, B., Rashidi, F., Iranmanesh, Y., Bordbar, S.K., Jahanbazy, H., Ramak, P., Rastegar, A., Zarafshar, M., Alimahmoodi Sarab, S., Askari, Y., Khanhasani, M., Mohammadian, A., Mohammadpour, M., Negahdarsaber, M.R., Henareh, J., Najafifar, A., & Rahimi, H. (2024). Reproduction and the importance of nurse species in the monitoring plots of Zagros forests, Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 32(1), 61-76.
Rostamikia, Y., & Zobeiri, M. (2012). Study on the structure of Juniperus excelsa Beib. stand in Khakhal protected forests. Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 19(4), 151-162.
Rostamikia, Y., & Fattahi, M. (2021). Effect of landform and edaphic characteristics on the presence and vegetative traits of Buckthorn (Rhamnus pallasii) in Andabil forest, Khalkhal region using PCA analysis. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation, 8, 1-18.
Sabeti, H. (1994). Forests, Trees and Shrubs of Iran, Yazd. University of Yazd.
Sadeghi, S.M.M., Alijani, V., Namiranian, M., & Mohamadizadeh, M. (2016). Structural characteristics of Juniperus excelsa in the mountainous forests of Alborz south facing slope (case study: Atashgah, Karaj). Iranian Journal of Forest, 8(1), 35-49.
Sagheb Talebi, Kh., Sajedi, T., & Pourhashemi, M. (2014). Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, A Hope for the Future. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Sagheb-Talebi, Kh., & Schütz, J.Ph., (2002). The structure of natural oriental beech (Fagus orientalis) in the Caspian region of Iran and potential for the application of the group selection system. Oxford University Press. Forestry, 75(4), 465-472.
Sefidi, K., Firouzi, Y., Keivan Behju, F., Sharari, M., & Rostamikia, Y. (2018). Quantification of spatial structure of juniper stands in Kandaragh region. Iranian Journal of Forest, 10(2), 207-220.
Scott, C. (1998). Sampling methods for estimating change in forest resources. Ecol Appl, 8, 228–233.
Sohrabi, H. (2014). Spatial pattern of woody species in Chartagh forest reserve, Ardal. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(1), 27-38.
Volume 18, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
Summer 2026
Pages 129-146

  • Receive Date 03 September 2025
  • Revise Date 21 November 2026
  • Accept Date 20 December 2025